Well Point Dewatering Spacing and Staging

A well point system lowers the water table around an excavation so the cut is made in the dry.

Run the calculator

Example

You enter

You get

Details, formula, and sources

A well point system lowers the water table around an excavation so the cut is made in the dry, and two constraints decide the layout. THE FIRST IS SUCTION LIFT AND IT IS A PHYSICAL CEILING, not a preference. A well point header pulls water by vacuum, and the practical lift is around fifteen to eighteen feet per stage whatever the pump -- atmospheric pressure sets the limit and no equipment negotiates it. An excavation needing more drawdown than that needs STAGES: a first ring at the original grade, then a second ring installed on a bench once the cut is deep enough to place it, and so on. A dewatering plan showing one ring of points at the top of a deep excavation has not accounted for the suction limit, and it will not reach subgrade -- which is discovered when the cut is open and the crew is standing in water. THE SECOND CONSTRAINT IS SPACING, AND ITS INTUITION RUNS BACKWARDS. The points must be close enough that their cones of depression OVERLAP, or the water table between them stays high and seeps into the cut. In a clean sand the cones are wide and flat and points can be far apart; in a silty sand the cones are narrow and steep and the points must be much closer together -- so LESS permeable soil needs MORE points, which is the opposite of the guess that less water means less equipment. Spacing therefore comes from the soil, and it is entered here rather than derived, because deriving it takes the aquifer properties and a flow net. The consequences of getting it wrong are not gradual. Water entering an excavation from below produces boiling and heave at the subgrade, which destroys the bearing surface; seepage through a slope face carries fines out and undercuts it; and both fail suddenly rather than progressively. Drawdown also settles adjacent ground, and structures inside that settlement bowl move with it. Geometry, staging, and a point count. IT DOES NOT COMPUTE THE FLOW to the excavation, which takes the aquifer's conductivity, its boundaries and thickness, and a flow net or an equivalent-well analysis, and which is what actually sizes the pumps -- the capacity reported here is only the entered per-point figure times the points, which is an upper bound the soil may not deliver. It does not size headers, pumps, or vacuum capacity, address recharge boundaries, confined aquifers, or artesian pressure below the subgrade, which is a separate and more dangerous case, or evaluate settlement of adjacent structures, discharge permitting, or the treatment of the discharged water. The dewatering contractor's design, the geotechnical investigation, and the engineer of record govern.

total drawdown = excavation depth + the margin below subgrade - the water table depth; stages = that drawdown / the practical suction lift, rounded up; points per stage = the excavation perimeter / the spacing.

The well point staging and layout relations by name. A vacuum header lifts only about 15 to 18 ft per stage whatever the pump, because atmospheric pressure sets the limit. SPACING IS ENTERED, not derived: it comes from the soil's cone of depression, and a LESS permeable soil needs points CLOSER together. It does not compute the flow to the excavation, which takes the aquifer properties and a flow net and is what sizes the pumps. The dewatering contractor's design, the geotechnical investigation, and the engineer of record govern.

Two divisions on a geometry the reader measures; no dewatering design is reproduced.

Estimate. AHJ and licensed professional govern.

Field names used by the API: excavation_depth_ft, water_table_depth_ft, subgrade_margin_ft, practical_lift_ft, excavation_length_ft, excavation_width_ft, point_spacing_ft, point_capacity_gpm, total_drawdown_ft, stages_required, drawdown_per_stage_ft, perimeter_ft, points_per_stage, point_count, system_capacity_gpm, header_length_ft

Related tools